Leading scientists try to crack anthrax puzzle

Unsolved mail killings vex academia, investigators

JOHANNA NEUMAN, LOS ANGELES TIMES

Originally published Monday, April 22, 2002

WASHINGTON -- Microbiologists, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

And in the absence of an FBI arrest in last fall's anthrax attacks, some of the nation's top scientists are offering their own theories.

In memos making their way around the Internet and in hallway conversations at professional conferences, leading scientists -- many fearful that an unsolved case will encourage other bioterrorists -- are applying their deductive reasoning to the anthrax-laced letters that killed five people and spread a new level of fear about biological warfare.

Their theories are full of intrigue: A disgruntled scientist. A covert government project gone awry. An accomplice to the Sept. 11 hijackers who stayed behind to mail the letters after their planes hit the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. Right-wing extremists stockpiling the deadly material in anticipation of a visit from the Internal Revenue Service.

"We all have our pet theories," said Jason Pate, a bioterrorism expert at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. "But none seems to fit the facts exactly."

The FBI has been working aggressively on the case, conducting thousands of interviews and hundreds of lab tests in consultation with some of the world's top scientific experts and in concert with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other agencies.

Some scientists applaud the effort -- crediting agents with catching on quickly to the complexities of microbiology. But others, led by Barbara Hatch Rosenberg of Purchase College, State University of New York, think the FBI has been, as she put it, "dragging its feet."

They are scornful of an FBI e-mail sent to 32,000 members of the American Society for Microbiology in January -- three months after the attacks stopped -- asking scientists for their help in locating the culprit, possibly a loner with access to an American lab. They wonder why the FBI outreach came so late, and so broadly, when people with expertise and access to anthrax materials is probably closer to 200 scientists.

For its part, the FBI privately takes a dim view of the analyst's armchair speculation. Mindful of their own mistakes in targeting Wen Ho Lee for spying in 1999 and Richard Jewell for the Atlanta Olympics bombing in 1996, the FBI is eager to get this one right.

Rosenberg, a molecular biologist, began the scientific sleuthing in February when she posted an article on the Web site of the Federation of American Scientists, www.fas.org/bwc, for which she has directed a panel on bioweapons for the past 10 years.

In the article, she writes that the anthrax discovered in the letters mailed to two U.S. senators was so refined that it contained one trillion spores per gram, characteristic of the "weaponized" anthrax made by U.S. defense labs.

Given the technical expertise required to produce that kind of anthrax, and the small universe of scientists with that knowledge, Rosenberg estimates that perhaps fewer than 40 people could be suspects.

She believes the perpetrator is one of her own: a disgruntled American scientist.

"He must be angry at some biodefense agency," she writes. "He is driven to demonstrate, in a spectacular way, his capabilities and the government's inability to respond."

At the heart of her case is a conspiracy theory, a conviction that the slowness of the investigation can be explained only by some big secret that the government wants to keep hidden for as long as possible.

"He is cocksure that he can get away with it," she writes of the perpetrator.

"Does he know something that he believes to be sufficiently damaging to the United States to make him untouchable by the FBI?"

The BBC cited Rosenberg in a news report this month suggesting there could have been a secret government program to test the practicalities of sending anthrax through the mail.

"Some very expert field person might have been asked to investigate the consequences of mailing anthrax, and it would have been left to him to decide exactly how to carry it out," she said.

"The result might have been a project gone badly awry if he decided to use it for his own purposes."

The FBI fumes at any suggestion it would deliberately sit on evidence, pointing out that it arrested one of its own, agent-turned-Russian spy Robert Philip Hanssen, as soon as it learned of his betrayal.

Still -- while not ruling out any theories -- the FBI's own public profile of the anthrax killer sounds a lot like Rosenberg's.

In its e-mail in January to microbiologists, the FBI asked them to be on the lookout for a loner.

"The perpetrator might be described as 'standoffish' and likely prefers to work in isolation as opposed to a group/team setting," it said. "It is possible this person used off-hours in a laboratory or (borrowed) equipment to produce the anthrax."

The Olympian Copyright 2002

back to Terror in America index